Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Chad Nowak's avatar

I think the mindset of checking the box has us forgetting that not everything can be easily accomplished or achieved in short order. The desire to have everything now, in the moment, often cheapens or degrades the end result.

I agree we should not devalue the experience by reducing its cost or expediting the process. Your points are well made that we must ensure the price we demand, our candidates and Brethren’s time and resources, is met by fair value in what we offer.

I find it concerning to occasionally hear some claim that raising dues and becoming more exclusive will resolve our problems, unless we increase the value of what they are receiving along with the cost.

Expand full comment
Horus on the Prairie's avatar

Our Scottish Rite makes you a 32nd Degree after a single reunion, but you have a passport book that records the degrees you have actually seen. When it's filled up you get a medal. However, each reunion is only good for four stamps, so you have to see the degree AND it has to qualify during that reunion. It's a good compromise that allows both full membership and an incentive to see each degree, often multiple times.

I just made Junior Deacon after a couple years of having to prove myself during rehearsal meetings, regular attendance, serving as Junior Steward, and filling in for other roles when those men were absent. The appointment certainly had meaning to it after all that other work.

There's a certain mindset of competition and credentialism people are caught in, especially among the upper middle class: higher and higher academic degrees, more certifications, more tickets punched to be competitive. Yet we often confuse the metric for what it is supposed to measure, so now we have academic degree inflation and mills where you just get the award without the work, because people demand it. Maybe we need to step back from this "credential creep".

An example in my jurisdiction is a proposal to have "past district deputy grand master" become a permanent title for those who previously served as such. It keeps getting voted down by huge margins: the masons here know that one more title, especially of an appointed position, dilutes the concept of titles to begin with.

Expand full comment

No posts

Ready for more?